Do you agree or disagree with these letters to the editor? Join in the conversation by submitting your own letter to the editor.

Click here to do so, or email your submission to letters@themonitor.com.


Stop changing Texans’ clocks

Through memes and witty tweets, internet humorists are taking aim at the nonsensical biannual changing of the clocks, asking, “Do we really need another hour of 2020?”

As we prepare to “fall back,” moving the hands of the clock as we do this time of year, let us once again ask ourselves why must we engage in this illogical process.

This strange ritual that has become ingrained in our lives since 1918, when the U.S. Congress decided to manipulate time by passing the Standard Time Act to save energy and create time zones. Back then, coal was our exclusive energy source and ensuring that Americans had more daylight working hours made sense.

Today, there seems to be no reason to continue this practice. In fact, in 2008 the U.S. Department of Energy determined that sticking with one time year-round could actually save approximately 0.5% of electricity per day nationwide.

The practice of changing our clocks has other significant drawbacks. The risk of heart attack increases 10% in the days following springing forward, most likely caused by sleep deprivation and the interruption of biological rhythms. Studies also indicate that we are more likely to get sick, less productive, and frankly just exhausted directly following the time change.

California and Florida have elected to observe daylight saving time year-round. The nation is waiting for Texas to pick one — daylight saving time or standard time — and stick with it. If the voters elect standard time, the change will be automatic. If voters elect daylight saving time year-round, we will need the Congress to amend federal law to allow states to remain on daylight saving time.

During the 2019 legislative session, my office filed legislation seeking to end this primitive practice. House Joint Resolution 117, if passed, would have allowed Texans the opportunity to vote whether to stay on standard time year-round or daylight saving time year-round. HJR 117 passed the House 133-9.

Frustratingly, once the bill reached the Senate, it was never referred to a committee. The proposal died in the Senate without even a word spoken about it on the Senate floor.

Had the bill passed in the Senate, it would have been the first time since daylight saving time was enacted more than a century ago that voters in Texas would have had the opportunity to vote to end the biannual clock-changing process.

For the last century, Texas legislative efforts to do away with the biannual clock adjustment have been attempted many times. None of those efforts have come this close to passage. We believe that our approach of allowing Texas voters to pick between keeping daylight saving time or standard time year-round provides the compromise needed to get this done.

My office is moving forward with plans to file the legislation again in the upcoming 87th Legislative Session, which begins in January. In the meantime, we urge you to contact your state legislators, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Gov. Greg Abbott to implore them to move this legislation forward next session.

State Rep. Lyle Larson

R-San Antonio


Secure election

I am a citizen and senior of these United States. I have voted in every election since I was eligible. In my experience, anyone with campaign literature (or signs) had to be a minimum of 20 feet away from a polling place.

In the recent debate between Trump and Biden, Trump asked Chris Wallace to name a white supremacist group, and the name, “The Proud Boys” was offered. Trump said, “Proud Boys. Stand back. Stand by.” The “boys” took this as a signal to be activated in the service of Trump during the election. They began calling themselves, “poll challengers.”

I’m not an attorney or an election official, but I don’t think it would be safe or legal for a white supremacist group, openly racist, to be poll watchers or whatever label they create for the election. I know there can be observers at elections, but let’s make sure that if there are, they are not torch-carrying neo-Nazis and that whoever they are, they have proper credentials.

Now it has come to light that federal prosecutors in the Justice Department may be taking action that could potentially interfere with the election: What country is this?

This is our election, the people. The campaigns are over on election day. It is my prayer and hope that local law enforcement here and in every town and city will be visible at polling places to let the people speak, the one time when we can, the one sacred action that has always distinguished us as unique in the world.

Shirley A. Rickett

Alamo


LETTERS — Limit letters to 300 words; all letters are subject to editing. Mail: P.O. Box 3267, McAllen, TX 78502-3267; Email: letters@themonitor.com

Letters to the Editor are written by concerned citizens just like you. To submit your own letter to the Editor email to letters@themonitor.com. Limit letters to 300 words. We will not publish anonymous letters, personal attacks or consumer complaints. Include your full name, address and a phone number for verification. All letters are subject to editing.