Municipal Elections

Unofficial Results from Hidalgo County
All Precincts Reporting

Mayor, City of Alamo

Diana Martinez – 1,343
Trinidad ‘Trino’ Medina – 1,118

City Commissioner – Place Two (2), City of Alamo

Joseph Sweet – 1,133
Pedro ‘Pete’ Morales – 1,328

City Commissioner – Place Four (4), City of Alamo

Michael P. Benedetti – 742
Maria Del Pilar Garza – 1,148
Lora ‘LJ’ Gioeni – 642

Special Election – City Commissioner – Place One (1), City of Alamo

Oscar ‘Okie’ Salinas – 1,439
Joel Casas – 973

Mayor, City of Edcouch

Fred Borrego, Jr. – 535
Virginio ‘Virgil’ Gonzalez, Jr. – 646

Alderman – Place 3, City of Edcouch

Carlos Castillo – 558
John Chapa – 619

Alderman – Place 4, City of Edcouch

Robert Gutierrez – 803

Councilmember – Place Three, City of Edinburg

Juan ‘Johnny’ Garcia – 2,104
Carlos Jasso – 1,875
Marc Roque – 239
Deanna ‘Coach’ Dominguez – 2,238

Councilmember – Place Four, City of Edinburg

David White – 3,659
David Torres – 2,846

Municipal Court Judge, City of Edinburg

Toribio ‘Terry’ Palacios – 4,312
Alma Garza – 2,197

Mayor, City of La Joya

Fito Salinas – 533
Isidro Casanova – 748
Jaime Gaitan – 271

Commissioner – Place 2, City of La Joya

Daniel Flores, Jr. – 461
Roger Hernandez – 770
Sylvia Cerda Oxford – 308

Commissioner – Place 4, City of La Joya

Dalia Arriaga – 495
Laura Mendiola Macias – 768
Aurora Ruiz – 286

Mayor, City of Weslaco

Alfredo ‘Duff’ Castañeda – 603
David Suarez – 1,548

Commissioner – District 5, City of Weslaco

Leticia ‘Letty’ Lopez – 180

Commissioner – District 6, City of Weslaco

Josh Pedraza – 208

Statewide Propositions

Unofficial Results from Secretary of State’s Office
237 of 254 Counties Reporting

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 1: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PERMITTING A PERSON TO HOLD MORE THAN ONE OFFICE AS A MUNICIPAL JUDGE AT THE SAME TIME.

Yes – 408,395
No – 791,793

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 2: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF ADDITIONAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS BY THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200 MILLION TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROJECTS IN ECONOMICALLY DISTRESSED AREAS.

Yes – 758,849
No – 432,261

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 3: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AUTHORIZING THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE FOR A TEMPORARY EXEMPTION FROM AD VALOREM TAXATION OF A PORTION OF THE APPRAISED VALUE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY DAMAGED BY A DISASTER.

Yes – 1,024,320
No – 168,723

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 4: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROHIBITING THE IMPOSITION OF AN INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX, INCLUDING A TAX ON AN INDIVIDUALS SHARE OF PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION INCOME.

Yes – 928,280
No – 271,948

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 5: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT DEDICATING THE REVENUE RECEIVED FROM THE EXISTING STATE SALES AND USE TAXES THAT ARE IMPOSED ON SPORTING GOODS TO THE TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT AND THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION TO PROTECT TEXAS NATURAL AREAS, WATER QUALITY, AND HISTORY BY ACQUIRING, MANAGING, AND IMPROVING STATE AND LOCAL PARKS AND HISTORIC SITES WHILE NOT INCREASING THE RATE OF THE STATE SALES AND USE TAXES.

Yes – 1,043,381
No – 154,702

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 6: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AUTHORIZING THE LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE BY $3 BILLION THE MAXIMUM BOND AMOUNT AUTHORIZED FOR THE CANCER PREVENTION AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS.

Yes – 761,598
No – 427,496

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 7: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ALLOWING INCREASED DISTRIBUTIONS TO THE AVAILABLE SCHOOL FUND.

Yes – 866,246
No – 323,373

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 8: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION OF THE FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE FUND TO ASSIST IN THE FINANCING OF DRAINAGE, FLOOD MITIGATION, AND FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

Yes – 909,671
No – 283,230

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 9: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AUTHORIZING THE LEGISLATURE TO EXEMPT FROM AD VALOREM TAXATION PRECIOUS METAL HELD IN A PRECIOUS METAL DEPOSITORY LOCATED IN THIS STATE.

Yes – 623,287
No – 535,415

STATE OF TEXAS PROPOSITION 10: THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW THE TRANSFER OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT ANIMAL TO A QUALIFIED CARETAKER IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.

Yes – 1,122,716
No – 74,264