BY ELIZABETH LIPPINCOTT
“Trump Digs Coal” became one of the most recognizable slogans of the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, and candidate Donald Trump’s promises to scrap the controversial Clean Power Plan (CPP) and bring back coal jobs struck a chord in Midwestern mining states. The vision of an unfettered, resurgent U.S. coal industry resonated with working class voters, helping to tilt the electoral map Trump’s way.
The Trump Administration is following through on its promises to scuttle the CPP, withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, and abolish other environmental regulations that are odious to the coal industry. However, the coal industry has continued to struggle against strong economic headwinds, primarily market competition from sustained low (sub-$4/mmBtu) natural gas prices.
Wall Street analysts agree that longterm economic forces are working against any federal effort to rehabilitate the U.S. coal industry. They identify the advanced age and inefficiency of many coal-fired power plants; long term regulatory uncertainty that disfavors investment in new coal plants; reduced demand from countries that import U.S. coal; and most importantly, sustained price competition from cheap natural gas as the major economic factors that make a U.S. coal renaissance highly unlikely.
In Texas, several utilities have announced plans to deploy more electric power from renewable energy regardless of changes in federal regulations. Luminant has announced plans early this year to close three coal-powered plants — Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown. CPS Energy, in San Antonio, has long planned to mothball the JT Deely coal plant by the end of 2018, and reiterated their decision after President Donald Trump’s executive order in March on the CPP. The Austin City Council voted in 2014 to begin phasing out of the city’s share of the coal-powered Fayette Power Project starting in 2020, with the goal of getting out of the project altogether by 2022.
As the longed-for coal recovery has been slow to materialize, policy discussions in Washington, D.C., and in Appalachian coal country have moved beyond loosening environmental controls and into the previously disfavored arena of direct market intervention in the form of taxpayer-funded coal subsidies.
Ill-conceived policies, like coal subsidies or taxpayer bailouts for coal plants, would distort the U.S. energy market and interfere with the well-functioning Texas electric market, delaying or derailing the Lone Star State’s market-driven transition to clean energy.
The Texas electric market is a model of how free energy markets allow cheaper, cleaner power to thrive. Natural gas and renewable energy will generate the lion’s share of electricity in Texas within 20 years — if we allow the electric market to function without distortions.
Research commissioned by the Texas Clean Energy Coalition (TCEC) and conducted by The Brattle Group in 2016 found that if natural gas prices remain low (about $4/MMBtu) and solar PV prices continue to drop, over the next 20 years then market forces will likely result in a cleaner Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) electric grid that relies on Texas-produced natural gas, wind, and utility-scale PV solar power. As the low natural gas price drives ERCOT away from coal and toward Texas-produced clean fuels, annual CO2 emissions in ERCOT are expected to drop by an average of
28 percent below 2005 levels — an average of
61 million tons less of CO2 in Texas air every year. And wholesale electricity prices should remain virtually flat in real-dollar terms.
An added benefit for Texas is that we generate our clean energy right here at home, so the transition away from coal plants will create thousands of good jobs and enormous economic prosperity for the Lone Star State.
Asking taxpayers to bear the burden of propping up a coal industry whose product cannot compete in the U.S. or global open-energy market is a violation of free market principles and a self-defeating economic policy for our state and our country.
Texans in Congress, state leaders and fiscal conservatives should reject attempts to manipulate the energy markets to prop up older, uneconomical plants that burn coal at the expense of cleaner, cheaper electricity produced from home grown natural gas, wind and solar power.