Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Unions question petition signatures

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Pharr police officers, firefighters hope to regain collective bargaining power

PHARR — Pharr’s police and firefighter unions are asking a judge to invalidate May’s vote that repealed their collective bargaining rights on the grounds that some signatures on the petition used to put the issue on the ballot were collected improperly.

The unions’ newest allegations follow their original complaint that the vote shouldn’t have taken place because a similar vote was held on the issue in 2006. The allegations of improper signatures were filed in the 275th state district court last week and name the city of Pharr and Mayor Leo “Polo” Palacios as defendants.

Pharr voters approved a measure in 2006 to give the unions collective bargaining rights. But on May 12, the city’s residents voted to repeal those rights.

The unions’ latest court filing says 242 signatures were collected on the petition in support of the repeal. It goes on to say that Pharr’s city clerk validated only 220 of those signatures — just two more than the 218 required to get the issue on the ballot.

John Curtis, the lawyer representing the police union, said he believes about a dozen signatures are questionable. If he can get even just a few thrown out, the election would be considered null and void, thus restoring collective bargaining for the unions, he said.Among the irregularities, he said, are signatories who listed their home addresses as post office boxes instead of their actual residences. He also said he has sworn statements from several people saying they signed the petition without being presented information about what they were signing.

Alan Ozuna, a lawyer working for the city on the collective bargaining dispute, said the unions’ complaints question whether the city had the authority to hold the election — not the way the election itself was conducted.

“Technically, none of those issues bear on an election contest,” he said.

Palacios said the city clerk went through the process of vetting improper signatures, which is why several were not validated by the city, and nothing wrong was found with the remaining ones.

The mayor said the dispute about the collective bargaining vote has gone on long enough, and he hopes it will be resolved soon, regardless of the outcome.

“It’s a waste of time and money for the city,” he said.

____

Ryan Holeywell covers PSJA and general assignments for The Monitor. You can reach him at (956) 683-4446.


See archived 'News' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Puzzles
Comics
The Monitor's Poll
Do you support a zero-tolerance policy in schools?
Yes, completely.
Yes, in most cases.
No, I don't think it works.
I am undecided.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
Lottery
Horoscopes
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site