Other Articles in this Category
Most Viewed Stories
- Police intercept sedan packed with at least 13 illegal immigrants
- 'He wanted to take me': Jogger says she was attacked at Bill Schupp Park
- Police arrest five suspected of shoplifting spree at South Texas dollar stores
- Sheriff: Shots fired as woman attempted to run over deputy
- Feds: Pharr officer assisted Zeta kidnapping ring
Most Commented Stories
Most Recommended Stories
Lawmaker's call for more border fencing gets cold reception from some
Comments 0 | Recommend 0While construction on the border fence in Cameron County is at a standstill because of pending lawsuits, at least one local landowner is surprised by a California congressman’s introduction of legislation that calls for more fencing construction along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The bill, known as the Unlawful Border Entry Prevention Act and introduced Wednesday by U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, D-Calif., gives Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano discretionary authority to build 350 miles of additional reinforced fencing where she deems it necessary. More than 650 miles of fence has already been approved along the U.S.-Mexico border.
The new measure, if approved, would amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.
The location of the proposed fencing would be up to Napolitano, said Hunter spokesman Joe Kaspar. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security would also have the option to decide if it would be second-layer fencing or an additional 350-miles of fence.
Kasper said the legislation has bipartisan support.
Co-sponsoring the legislation are Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, Bart Stupak, D-Mich., Mike McIntyre, D-N.C., Ed Royce, R-Calif., and Brian Bilbray, R-Calif.
“How ridiculous” this additional fence legislation is, said Cameron County landowner Pamela Taylor, whose home on Nogales Road will be affected by the border fence that has already been authorized for construction.
“If the first fence didn’t work, what makes (Hunter) think two fences are going to work?” Taylor asked.
She wonders how much money is being spent on the initial fence and where funding would come from for additional fencing should the legislation be approved.
“There are so many things we need to put the money into,” such as health care, the 80-year-old said. “We worry too much about the (activities in) Mexico. We need to worry about the United States.”
Hunter cites the ongoing border violence and illegal drug and terrorist activity for his sponsoring of the legislation. The current fencing mandate does not provide Homeland Security the authority to construct additional fencing after Dec. 31, 2009, the bill states.
“As the last few remaining miles of border infrastructure are completed and we work to strengthen our overall security presence on the Southwest border, it is important that DHS continue to receive and retain the necessary tools to do its job,” Hunter said in a news release. “This includes the authority to gain immediate and operational control of the border through the construction of additional infrastructure.”
Hunter said enforcement along the border has been strengthened because of the fence, allowing the U.S. Border Patrol “to refocus its efforts as needed.
“Simply put, fencing works,” the lawmaker said.
U.S. Rep. Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Corpus Christi, said he plans to monitor the bill closely as it makes it way through the Committee of Jurisdiction, which will review the measure.
“The process for a bill becoming law is long and uncertain; nonetheless, those of us who represent congressional districts along the U.S.-Mexico border know firsthand we don’t need 350 additional miles of fencing,” Ortiz said in a prepared statement. “I strongly stand against this bill, and should the bill make it to the House floor, I plan on voting against it.”
The current fence’s construction is part of the 2006 Secure Fence Act, which is part of the government’s comprehensive immigration policy that includes securing the nation’s border. Homeland Security is overseeing the fence’s construction.
In Cameron County, 34.8 miles of fencing is planned. While some portions are in place on South Oklahoma Road, some are pending because of ongoing lawsuits. Those cases are scheduled to be addressed July 31 before U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen.
Additional fencing in the county is visible along Military Highway, also known as Highway 281. Much of the fencing in this area was constructed earlier this year.
____
Laura B. Martinez is a reporter for The Brownsville Herald.
See archived 'Now' stories »
We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.







Delicious
Digg
Facebook
FriendFeed
LinkedIn
MySpace
Reddit
Slashdot
StumbleUpon
Tumblr
Twitter
Yahoo! Buzz




